The consequence of “theory” the flat earth is denying almost all the disciplines that are for this is true, like gravity, the sun around the earth, as well as the eclipse, and various other things. How can it take the conclusions of this problem? In article zenius, Fanny's ever talked about how to extract conclusion, which if there is the problem, then we should test it with the experiment or data.
Go back to Alfred Russel Wallace, although he win the bet, but it is very disesalinya and even he said "most regrettable incident in my life". How come? For decades, he and his family constantly received death threats, legal issues and various terror of John Hapmden the fanatics and can not accept defeat. Next, Mr. Wallace said :.
"The next matter was a much more serious one, and cost me fifteen years of continued worry, litigation, and persecution, with the final loss of several hundred pounds. And it was all brought upon me by my own ignorance and my own fault—ignorance of the fact so well shown by the late Professor de Morgan—that" paradoxers, "as he termed them, can never be convinced, and my fault in wishing to get money by any kind of wager. It constitutes, therefore, the most regrettable incident in my life.".
Until now, of course there's a lot of people who still believe in the earth flat. This is where the hell is my personal hand to accept each other, it's their right. Do we want to continue to get on with the science that has been tested many times by scientists with a variety of approaches, or want to go back 2300 years? One valuable lessons that can be gleaned from Wallace, don't spend it arguing with fanatics.