Wo'O Ideafarm
@ideafarmNOT a "safe space"; truth boldly spoken here, "man to man"! I am here to build relationships, not to make money. Please click my web link for details.
Resource Credits
Available
Used
$ 0.021
1
$ 0.000
1
RE: Progress: "Free speech zone" traffic reports database: The software has a 2 million field capacity limit. I'm now working on eliminating that limit.
IDEAFARM.COM will complement STEEM by focusing on serving the needs of authors and readers, which will enable the STEEM community to maximize STEEM cryptocurrency value by making it as useful as possible
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
It's coming. Most of my time is going to legal maneuvers right now, but I am continuing to push forward on the "free speech zone" software. The current software changes add a traffic history
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
I'm putting the hard sell on you only to demonstrate the problem for others. Your remarks about how we need to be "one for all all for one" like those farmers on Planet Anarchy is dead on target.
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
You aren't telling me anything I don't already know, and it is silly for you to think that you can advise me without spending at least a couple of hours reviewing the procedural context. I repeat, I need
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
Interesting. I'm starting to think that there might be something real to your "wrench". But the bottom line is that I need to find people who will do what I need them to do, rather than what
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
My prior post was unduly negative. I am exhausted. The procedure that you are referring to is, in California, called a demurrer. (There is also a motion in arrest of judgment.) In Federal District Court,
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
The law (Penal Code 1004) does not work that way in California, and I am skeptical that it does, or even could, work that way anywhere. What jurisdiction was your case in?
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
My contrary opinion is that the path to empowerment is not to eliminate force, which is impossible, but instead to distribute it widely by destroying all concentrations of power, thus empowering individuals
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
I don't mean to put you personally on the spot. I'm using your own remarks to prove that you, like everyone else, are powerless to stand with me in any meaningful, effective way. You have neither the time,
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
We, like automobile engines, are designed to operate under load. The frontier life that you romanticize placed a heavy load on those settlers, as well as on the native populations that they competed with
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
Interesting. I like, and agree with, what you've said. That is indeed the way that it should be, and the way that it could be. But it only works with a moral population. It only works, as you point out,
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
Saying that anarchy is the mother of order doesn't make it true. Please explain how that works. It seems to me that if there is no force imposing and maintaining order, some force will arise to change
RE: I could be in jail in 60 minutes. I've been using myself as "stingbait" for 8 years, gathering evidence of corruption at Court. On Friday, I got what I needed, but at the cost of exposing myself to being jailed on contempt.
In the sci-fi story, what keeps farmer #2 from walking up to farmer #1 with a gun, killing him, and taking farmer #1's wife and tractor? For a less violent scenario, what recourse does farmer #1 have if