icyflow

I would prefer a lending contract mm. But I'm not sure how much a sps listing will even help. It seems that getting Dec listed would have more direct benefit to the DAO and sps. This would remove liquidity

WTF. This proposal actually makes me mad. How many fucking times do we need to sacrifice the game to benefit bot farms. Bot farms will take full advantage of burning worthless cards for far more valuable

I would be fine with a maximum of 50k packs for the event. This wouldn't affect the current circulation of RW cards and packs by very much.

This is a hard no. I like the idea of burning cards for cards but not RW packs. This is like trading pennies for quarters. It's a huge fu to those who bought. Alternative: I think that a card burn mechanic

This is impossible to enforce as much as I would like it to pass, I cannot support this. The only fair way to address battle helpers is to make it available to everyone. I would support a proposal for

If the accounts are forever inactive then its essentially burned. But should they come back it could renew there interest in the game. I don't know why this is even a proposal. It spits in the face of

Seems unfair

I would support a account value based mav chat. Not this. You can put up any gate you want it will not stop human nature.

I want to reduce emissions but this should be scheduled for stability. A token with mechanics that change on a whim is not enticing. I suggest reducing all emissions not the total supply every 2 years