Note: I originally posted this on coronacircus.com (proof) on March 31 2020 (here). I loved how you guys took back your chain recently, so I wanted to be part of this community; I will start sharing my posts here too. Hopefully they are well received.
Our understanding of this ongoing coronavirus situation is quite different from that we were able to find, either in the mainstream or alternative press. We have therefore decided to share it.
In a nutshell, we see this crisis as the greatest offensive in psychological warfare since 9/11; the objective is mainly that of subversion, i.e. of undermining the people’s trust in their institutions. The end goal is to foment revolt, and to destroy the prevailing order. The ambition is to usher in a “new world order”, that is not the caricature described by the likes of Alex Jones (one government, one religion, one money), but a “multipolar” order led by China. This involves the controlled demolition of the USA, and the imposition of a new collectivist and technocratic paradigm, similar to what the successors of Mao have been doing in the Middle Kingdom.
The bottom line is we believe the virus will go away as quickly as it arrived, and people in the West will then be faced with economic depression and monetary meltdown. It will end-up benefiting China greatly. The ambition is to foment cynicism and revolt in the West; to successfully impose a new order you must first destroy the existing one. Ordo ab chao; it is subversion in the strict sense.
At the end of the post we will try to make predictions, as that is how theories are validated a posteriori.
The basic assumption we make is that the USA (and indeed most of the world) is governed by an occult and relatively monolithic set of interests that own most of the press, cinematic productions, corporations, regimes, and that have been steering (and falsifying) political events in the 20th and 21st century at least. If you don’t share this understanding, it is useless to read on, as the piece will admittedly seem completely crazy.
A lot has already been written on the topic, so we won’t be defining subversion, or retracing its history. For those interested, we can recommend this excellent book.
Instead, we ask to please consider the following questions:
There are many many more examples. These are not glitches. Here is the answer you are looking for: there is, and has been for a while, a deliberate effort to foment distrust and revolt in the West. The idea is to destroy any semblance of public trust in existing institutions, in the prevailing order. For if you wish to usher in a new order, you must first destroy the existing one. In other words, many conspiracy theories, however true, are part of the conspiracy.
You are supposed to be questioning 9/11; you are supposed to be outraged at the 2008 bank bail-out; you are supposed to think Epstein was murdered or escaped. Those who aren’t, a minority, are called useful idiots, are given a loudspeaker, and are used to alienate the silent majority.
Central planners and “revolution makers” have, after all, been practicing for a long time. Indeed we don’t think the Arab Springs, the Iranian Green Revolution, the Orange Revolution, or the Maidan Revolution were organic or endogenous at all. We don’t even think the revolutions across South America during the Cold War, or May 68, or even the Bolshevik revolution were any more spontaneous than the Reichstag fire.
Indeed most of the revolutions and episodes of unrest in the world in the 20th and 21st century were orchestrated; in hindsight one might see this, but it would have admittedly been difficult to notice if one were caught up in the events. Similarly, it is difficult to understand what is going on right now, and the type of subversion we are currently being subject to.
Here is another provocative, congruent idea: the whole “cultural revolution” whereby men who amputate their testicles de facto become women is not meant to convince a significant number of people. Please look at this short clip and tell us it’s not a provocation, agitation propaganda. People who buy into it are mostly a side effect (and victims of body dysmorphia are used as tools). This kind of agitation is meant to demoralize and conquer. It is meant to foment distrust and revolt.
Interestingly, the exact same kind of agitation propaganda was used in Weimar Germany. And surely, our readers know who put the Nazis in power; if not, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (full book PDF by Anthony Sutton, archive) and 51 Documents (full book PDF, by Lenni Brenner, archive) will set you in the right direction.
It is hopefully clear in 2020 that Donald Trump is not “against the deep State” and that he is not “draining the swamp”. Actually, he did drain the swamp: into his cabinet.
Yet this realization comes with huge implications, for anyone who remembers the 2016 campaign. If Donald Trump’s reign was indeed preordained, it means his campaign amounted to an impressive psychological operation. To convince you of this, here is one exhibit.
On the holiday week-end of July 4th 2016, central propaganda outlets accused Donald Trump of being antisemitic. In and of itself that is, ofcourse, absurd; Mr. Trump is Chabad in all but in name. But more interestingly, the proof that was offered was this poster and the six-pointed star it featured. In effect, that poster was plastered all over the telescreens, magazines, newspapers, etc. The face of Clinton with the text “most corrupt candidate ever” was everywhere.
The average American must have seen it 20-30 times at least on thatweek-end, as the poster was changed to feature a circle instead of a six-pointed star, and it was once again plastered all over.
Of course this image was presented under the guise of criticizing it, but that’s exactly the point: it was shown ad nauseam, and its message was imprinted in the collective mind. That’s all that matters. The claim that Donald Trump is antisemitic was quickly forgotten (and never repeated) anyway.
On the exact same holiday week-end, Comey (head of the FBI) came on TV and gave his famous speech about Clinton, which boils down to “she’s guilty but we won’t be pursuing her because she’s above the law”. Watch the speech again if you don’t remember. The rest of the campaign served as confirmation for the events that took place during that holiday.
Do you see where we’re going with this? These people know what they’re doing. They have control groups. They understand demographics and identity biases. They know the emotional impacts of every message they put out. They’ve been practicing all over the world for more than a hundred years. Subliminal programming is the rule, not the exception.
They put Trump in power by promoting his ideas under the guise of criticizing them. Clinton was the scarecrow, the manufactured villain. Every superhero needs a supervillain; and a villain she is indeed.
Scott Adams (the creator of Dilbert, hypnotist and Trump supporter) did an excellent job throughout the campaign at explaining the persuasion and manipulation techniques leveraged by Donald Trump. He called him a master wizard, and coined the expression “3D chess” when applied to his candidate; Adams simply missed the fact this was more than the work of Trump alone. And of course, let’s not forget Steve Piecenik video(s) about a “coup” being “supported by intelligence services” (supposedly the good guys); let’s also make sure we realize who this guy is (namely, one of the US’ foremost experts in psychological warfare).
So, the Donald Trump campaign was an unprecedented psychological operation.
The same strategy continued after the election: the preposterous “Russia collusion” story, as the absurd impeachment narrative, were not meant to be believed by most. They were meant to distract his base from his appointments and decisions, to sustain cognitive and identity biases (and the illusion he is somehow “against the deep State”), and ultimately to favor his popularity. In the same way as the “golden shower” theater, or the “grab them by the pussy” story turned out to be counterproductive to his detractors, so did these “affairs” that followed the election.
What we are saying is all that was done on purpose.
At this point, you may ask: but why? Who has anything to gain from any of this? Why would central planners wish to destroy the people’s trust in Western institutions? Why would they go through all this trouble to put a puppet like Trump in power? Aren’t there more straightforward methods? And more importantly, what does any of this have to do with the coronavirus?
On that last question: we are getting there. But first, a few remarks about the new world order.
British writer and futurist H. G. Wells, in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined that expression as a synonym for the establishment of a technocratic world state and of a planned economy. It was re-popularized by George H. W. Bush, 11 years to the day before 9/11/01, during his address before a joint session of Congress; he described it as “a world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfill the historic vision of its founders.”
In subsequent years, that vision was made more explicit. Henry Kissinger stated on April 19 1994, at the World Affairs Council Press Conference (Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel): “Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions”. Tony Blair, on January 7, 2003, stated that “the call was for a new world order; but a new order presumes a new consensus. It presumes a shared agenda and a global partnership to do it”.
Gordon Brown then called for a “new world order” in a 2008 speech in New Delhi to reflect the rise of Asia and growing concerns over global warming and finance. Brown said the new world order should incorporate a better representation of “the biggest shift in the balance of economic power in the world in two centuries” (i.e. the rise of China). That last understanding has been the prevailing one since that time; the rapid rise of China (and the BRICs in general) call for a new “multilateral” world order, one in which the USA gives up its status as the sole superpower, and by
extension a world in which the US dollar ceases to be a global reserve currency.
On the surface, a multipolar world order, one which isn’t dominated by American interests, seems like a good idea. Yet, and however much one might justly abhor US imperialism, one must recognize the USA is the only country of any significant size ever founded on the idea of an individual’s natural and inalienable right to life and liberty. That is a truly exceptional notion, one directly inherited from the Enlightenment. Yes, the USA made two unforgivable historical mistakes. True, the USA drifted very far from its founding ideals. But still, it is a beautiful realization, one that is also inherent to the first part of the first article of the 1789 declaration of human rights: “Men are born and remain free and equal in rights“.
We contend that the new world order, first and foremost, is about destroying that idea. The new world order is intrinsically collectivistic. Collectivism abhors, recoils at the notion that individuals have a natural and inalienable right to life. It stands for the exact opposite: the herd is supreme, the “greater good” rules, and as such, the individual is nothing; he should bow to the supreme collective. The only rights men have is that which is granted by the State. That is collectivism, whether seen through its Communist or Fascist lens. That is all that China, and much of the world, has ever known.
To successfully usher in such a new order, the USA must be humiliated and destroyed. The values it stands for (or rather, nowadays, purports to stand for) must be ridiculed. It must suffer in the 21st century the same fate as Russia and Germany did in the 20th. It was already pillaged, drained of all its wealth, and it stands ready to be discarded like an old cloth. The coronavirus is a central piece of that controlled demolition, and Donald Trump has a critical role to play in that plan.
Alain Soral (a highly “controversial”, yet very popular French intellectual) does an excellent job at explaining how the coronavirus crisis (more particularly, its handling by the State) will end-up provoking rebellion and revolt in France. He convincingly explains how the Yellow Vest movement, which was until now mostly composed of the sous-prolétariat, will this year be joined by the middle class. The only thing missing from his analysis is, of course, the realization that this is done on purpose, i.e. that it is indeed part of the script.
In the spirit of the provocations, agitation propaganda and subversion we highlighted earlier, here are a few examples, particular to this coronavirus situation:
And then of course, conspiracy theories are being deliberately planted and fueled:
That’s enough. We believe we have given sufficient examples. We are not even mentioning covers such as these; the provocations are too numerous to exhaustively list. Once you understand subversion and agitation propaganda, and the planners’ goal to utterly destroy trust in the prevailing institutions, suddenly all the “news” becomes more coherent, and contradictions in the narrative suddenly disappear.
This is where our theory will truly be put to the test. If most of what we have written is true, if our interpretation is correct, then what prediction can we make?
As of this writing, 31st of March 2020, the crisis is just starting in the USA. So our first set of predictions concern that country, for the short and medium term.
Here is a huge, symbolic sign we are waiting for: some US personalities/politicians will publicly say “the Federal government has let us down”, and will “ask China for help”. We are expecting sinophilic speeches similar to the one the Serbian president gave on March 15th 2020. China will be seen as “all too happy” to act in a way that will be compared to the Marshall plan.
Here is what we believe will happen in Europe, after the crisis passes near the late spring / early summer:
In the medium term, this is what we believe will happen globally:
In the slightly longer term, here is what we are expecting:
Of course we are not expecting all of our predictions to pan out, or our timing to be always on the money. There is a lot of uncertainty left; we are probably missing several important pieces of the puzzle. We don’t even think the central planners are able to anticipate developments with perfect precision, however many resources or computer models they rely on.
And yet, a question remains: what should anyone of us do about all this? Can we prevent any portion of it? How do we protect ourselves, and our family? Without professing anything, we will try to answer these questions in future posts.
