Hello community! This is your mastermind speaking...
Imagine receiving 53 documents on your desk about the alleged rise in damage caused by global warming due to alleged extreme phenomena, 52 of which show that there is actually no increase in such damage, and only one of which, tainted by fundamental errors, shows a growth. Knowing full well that this will be able to execute a series of changes that results in the impoverishment of enormous human masses, any person with intellectual honesty would be careful not to totally accept the sole document among the many that observes phenomena connected to supposed global warming. However, if you are an Ipcc (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) ideological bureaucrat with lucrative connections to philanthropists and resettarians who donate money, you may be able to put together a general report in which you accept the lone and catastrophic thesis while concealing the fact that it is a very minority thesis in a footnote. It will be very unlikely for your dishonesty to come to light since you work for the media and web masters who are ready to lash out at anyone who questions a verb that is completely meaningless from a factual point of view but full of consequences on the social-political one in line with the perspectives of the command elite.
And that the only thing that sticks in people's minds will be press conferences.
If it weren't for the fact that someone really reads these IPCC reports, they could discover how this panel rewrites climate history, emphasizes worst-case scenarios, and has a strong bias in favor of bad news over good news. Accordingly, it appears that the IPCC disregarded important peer-reviewed material that demonstrated that normalized catastrophe losses have dropped since 1990 and that the rate of human death from extreme weather has decreased by more than 95% since 1920. The widely disseminated Summary for Policymakers, which is intended for decision-makers unaware of how they are formulated climatic hypotheses passed off as established truths, completely eliminates the good news, i.e. those that do justice to an outdated catastrophism. For example, the IPCC report AR6 or the most recent report to be released argues that humans have contributed to floods, while the Summary for Policymakers states the exact reverse, that human impact has exacerbated flooding. Thus, there are two levels: one that modifies the status of research in some way, creating the ideal environment for huge falsehoods, and another that is more focused on the political and administrative sectors, which completes the task and dispels any doubt.
Given this foundation, it is understandable why recent study revealing that 42% of the IPCC's climate scenarios are predicated on improbable future temperature increases that even the UN-funded organization acknowledges are of low chance dealt a serious blow to the IPCC's credibility. Except that this information is really hidden deep inside the most recent report, making it impossible for anybody who does not know where to look or who the UN panel's bureaucrats are to find it.
However, a report examining the entirety of the most recent IPCC report and written by some of the most significant climate scientists in the world, published by the Clintel Foundation, highlights the significant fact that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, rather than solid science based on solid data. Even worse, we are still debating theories about anthropogenic global warming that have been around for 50 years while entirely ignoring alternative warming variables that have only recently been found and have no political significance. Since the research of all of this is still at the stage it was in 1979, the influence of a specific number of gases in the atmosphere, including CO2, is still the subject of the greatest uncertainty.
The newest IPCC report claims that the supposed rise in sea level is accelerating but notes that there is no evidence to support this. On the other hand, when you know you don't know, the strategy is one of bewilderment. However, we may also say convinced the pace of the climatic grip is quickening and that the data is more than convincing.
Don't believe the lies! The truth sets us free! Have a good day !
image from here
