Sorry for the repeat comment.

Like dude, if people want to go to Blurt and think it is better, that's fine, and frankly, I think it's a good thing for people to have alternatives. I think FRIENDLY competition creates A LOT of value.

I think having a downvote free alternative is totally reasonable. And if people from Blurt want to make a case why it is better, that is a totally reasonable and a normal thing to do.

What I do not think is reasonable is the marketing approach most Blurt users have.

Coming to HIVE and trying to paint HIVE in a negative light does not make Blurt look attractive. I also cannot imagine how rough it is over at Blurt if all these people over there are having all this resentment FOR YEARS over downvoting which is something that HIVE has always had.

If people want Blurt to do well, I do not think people coming here and crapping on HIVE is going to work.

Who knows where Blurt would be today if the marketing approach for Blurt was positive vs negative.

Most negative marketing is not effective unless you are trying to get someone NOT to do something.

Maybe the negative marketing approach works at getting people not to use HIVE, but I do not believe it works at getting people to use Blurt.

I think people are creating a lose lose when creating a win win is totally possible.

Like just imagine where Blurt would be if people from Blurt did not act like this.

If people get downvoted here and want an alternative and people from Blurt were actually nice rather than vindictive, there is a world where I would recommend Blurt to people.

But not like this. Not when it is obvious how crazy it is over there based on how the Blurt users act here.