I've been following the climate change debate for close to 3 years now, and I think I'm fairly well informed on it. The climate scientists have been sounding the alarm for literally decades, but they have

Nobody is using Greta to do anything. She writes her own speeches and follows her own conscience. Sure, Greta needed help with her campaign, so she got herself an assistant. What about it? Does she get

First, we need to get the US gov't to legislate an end to its regime change operations, and then cut its military budget. This will free up funds needed for protecting and restoring the environment, as

We've been lied to for so long, by our government, MSM, academia, big banks, and corporations - the establishment. The "old white men in suits" establishment spares nothing to secure its favored

The climate scientists record the air temps at many locations throughout the world and calculate an average global temp for the year. There's a graph in the link. Notice how the average global temp in

IMO, this is a disinformation and propaganda video. It's factually accurate, but in reference to the climate change debate, it starts lying from the start. Climate change pertains to the entire globe,

Overpopulation is part of the problem, as is over consumption. It's not about space. There's plenty of space. The problem is the production of goods and services (buildings, food, cars, electricity, etc)

Here's how I determine if I'm listening to an fossil fuel industry paid liar. First look at his/her background. Is he/she a climate scientist or experienced in a related discipline? If not, forget it,

OF COURSE the Earth's climate has been changing naturally over its lifespan. Why even mention that? No one is disputing that. And, it's continuing to change naturally right now, but on top of that, human

Greta is not an authority on climate change, but the climate scientists are. Greta is carrying and publicizing the climate scientists' message. They are not very good at public affairs. Greta has already

This is not about fear-mongering. The science of climate change is VERY dire, unfortunately. It will cost trillions of dollars over decades to effectively deal with climate change and only governments

Mother nature releases most of the CO2 present in the atmosphere through the decay of organic matter. In turn, most of this CO2 is absorbed by the oceans, plants and trees. Through this release and absorption

Several studies I've seen show China (27.2%) , US (14.6%), and India (6.8%) at one, two, and three in annual CO2 emissions. The US was no.1 up until about 15 years ago, when China blew by us, a large part

The internet is also full of fossil fuel disinformation agents like the Heartland Institute, who discredit climate scientists and activists. Here's how I spot a fossil fuel industry paid liar. First look

Well, the protest is located at the root of the problem, that being the WH and its ignorant, arrogant, and stupid resident. The US was the leader in CO2 emissions until China overtook it in recent years.

Greta's parents were busy pursuing their demanding careers and were unaware of the climate change debate. It was Greta who studied the evidence presented by the climate scientists, and educated her parents

The problem is that the climate scientists are not good at publicizing their warnings about climate change. And the fossil fuel interests have been fighting tooth and nail against any action that will

AOC said the world is going to end if nothing is done, but she's very misinformed. Basically, Greta and the climate scientists are saying that if we don't cut our carbon emissions, humanity will suffer

It's a long story, but climate scientists have been warning that the Earth's average atmospheric temperatures have been slowly rising over the past 170 years or so. Mother nature releases CO2 into the

IMO, we may never become technologically advanced enough to colonize the Moon and Mars because we'll be too busy trying not to go extinct first. But eventually, after a massive depopulation, humankind