I guess my comment is going to be the same as the one to you above regarding the low impact of "regular" proposals on the hbdstabilizer in terms of contributions.

f we wanted we could print a 100 billion HIVE into the DHF but that wouldn't necessarily mean there is a market for it. At some point we end up back where Steem was when Steemit was (arguably) dumping more than the market could absorb for their own funding and it was self-defeating in a way, because the more they sold, the more the price went down, hurting the funding.

So this is where I argue that funding development is how we create that need from the market that can then absorb it, but I agree that it's definitely not a given and the hbdstabilizer is a much more straightforward and "safe" way (in the sense of how risky it is to have benefits compared to the funds) to bring benefits to hive.