![WrongScience.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmcjqhRCBPJvSBFHUdYAm6a45nhwiABgSLnqfBN79EdGjP/WrongScience.png) In the battle between Albert Einstein and Neils Bohr, Bohr and quantum mechanics won, so why do we still teach Einstein's theories? Most people answer this with "because quantum deals with tiny things, and Relativity deals with larger things", however, that is not the case. There are paradigms that quantum mechanics proves. And those paradigms destroy Relativity at its assumptions. Einstein's theory of relativity was created to close the door on "instantaneous action at a distance" Too bad that Entangled Particles shows that instantaneous action at a distance is occuring. The paradigms that define quantum mechanics do not stop being true at larger scales. And so many of these paradigms directly conflict with Modern Materialistic Science. So, why is this Materialist crap taught still? - - - - - - -

## Dual slit experiment ramifications The dual slit experiment shows that matter really isn't real. That a photon / electron only exists as a probability wave until viewed by someone. This means that the entire premise of Materialistic Science is wrong. Modern Materialistic Science assumes that matter exists, out there, separate from us. It is in the Scientific Method. Make observations, which we cannot do without changing what we are observing. We are a part of the observation. We will have to rewrite science, and the scientific method. Another thing that quantum mechanics shows us is that the observer affects the outcome. And if this is the case, then the idea of an "out there" an observable phenomena, that exists separate from us doesn't exist. all those tests we did and the results that we got, could just be because that is what we all expected, and have no real bearing on proving anything. - - - - - - -

## Light, and its speed It appears that light's speed is based on how fast each of the frames of the universe appear and the plank constant. In other words, the light goes to each pixel, and the speed of light is just about how big the pixels are. And there is no guarantee that the plank constant is the constant everywhere. It actually makes more sense if the pixels are larger in the middle of "empty" space, and smaller (more tightly packed) in places with more entities watching. So, again, the assumption of the Theory of Relativity are bunk. And, everyone would know that, if they taught quantum physics and discarded the Einstein palp. - - - - - - -

## Entangled particles and their ramifications. Instantaneous communication, across the galaxy is possible, we just have to get it to work, work out the engineering. And it would be so much easier if Modern Materialistic Science stops saying it can't be done. It is already been shown that it can be done, it is now, just a matter of making it easier and cheaper. And there may be other manners of instantaneous communication like other aspects of aether. But, we can't study aether either. Modern Materialistic Science says it doesn't exist. Anyway, we will soon have internetz everywhere on the planet, without wires or cable. We will, after we figure it out, say "it was soooo simple", if only we hadn't given up on the Aether. - - - - - - -

The paradigms inherit in quantum physics tells us that Modern Materialistic Physics is wrong. We have had 75 years to realize this and get our science back on track. Fortunately, more and more people are finding other science theories, and are dropping the materialistic's scams. But, it is really hard, because we don't have a completely new text book that explains everything as well. The new theories have a LOT of "we don't know" places. (Modern Materialistic Science text books would also have these, but they have all been papered over with more layers of lies. And this is so sad, because Bohr spent so much energy going up against Einstein. And, we basically took that and through it in the dustbin. - - - - - - -

All images in this post are my own original creations.

한국프레스센터 양자산업컨퍼런스 패널토론