And now, a more serious comment. Your analysis did not appear to be misinformation. It was pragmatic analysis - and those without assets in an eco system performing pragmatic analysis is exactly what people should encourage - because if you have favourable conclusions, that would lure others into it.

If you have conclusions that do not appear to be bullish, or favourable, based on your research (excusing any potential gaps in it) - then well, that isn't good marketing.

My own pragmatic analysis of the LEO project has been one that shows (and I will be happy to be wrong in the future) - unsustainable growth as THE MODEL, as opposed to a pragmatic, realistic projection of "even if this (realistic situation) is the worst case scenario", here is what happens.

The future isn't promised.