I use @dbuzz. Slightly less than I used to because recent events in my life have been taking up my time. This seems to be like a battle against two extremes.

On the one hand I like what @hivewatchers does. If they go after @dbuzz though I feel like other Dapps like @actifit which also tends to be "short-form" will be next. Last June one posted actifit report only contained the words "walk" and "walking" repeated to use up the minimum characters. I commented with a link to a YouTube clip of the ending of The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension asking which one of the characters the user was.

I don't think it's unreasonable to fear that @hivewatchers would be consistent and apply the same standards for @chrisrice and @dbuzz against @actifit. Using what I I guess is the logic @hivewatchers is using against @dbuzz a short post with a link to a 10 minute 3Speak video would also be "spam". A ten minute video easily takes more than 10 minutes to make when editing time is added. Is a three-paragraph essay with introduction, body, and conclusion really necessary to justify a post with a 3Speak video link? If a three-paragraph essay is necessary than why wasn't that information covered in the video? Is it just rehashing what's on the video which ironically would lean it more, in my opinion, toward the "spam" area.