This article was written in collaboration with Eric Björk of Sw/eden, Eugene Luzgin of EOS Tribe, Jae Chung of @HKEOS, Igor Lins e Silva of EOS Rio, Michael Yeates of eosDAC, and 
The EOSIO software is both groundbreaking and revolutionary. It has the potential to bring a new era of blockchain applications and create new paradigms in blockchain usability, scalability and governance. Thousands of people, including the people involved in this release, have invested huge amounts of time and money to ensure this potential is realised. This is all culminating in an expected launch of an EOS mainnet on June 2nd/3rd 2018.
However, the EOS mainnet is a unique target for attack. With a year long ICO and so much money raised, large community involvement, huge expectations, it is reasonable to assume that there are malicious detractors who wish it harm. We feel it prudent to consider the nature of possible attacks, and the defenses and procedures expected to be in place against such attacks.
The processes implemented in the eos-bios program, result in severe vulnerabilities, allowing any attacker to damage or destroy producer nodes or the entire blockchain. The excessive information about the producer network published directly on the blockchain will allow all types of attack, from protocol injection up to volumetric DDoS attacks.
While it is never possible to perfectly secure any system, it is irresponsible to not create some reasonable defenses. In this message, we detail some of the attacks possible, demonstrate some tested attacks against the insecure boot chain, and then suggest our preferred method of bootstrapping in a more secure manner.
We deeply regret any discomfort and angst caused by this. We have tried to explain the problems and suggest solutions in public and private Telegram chat rooms for over two months. We have encouraged modifications to the proposed automatic bios code. Alas, changes to the security model have not been implemented, and have been actively resisted. We feel that we are left with no choice but to publish a few precise and demonstatable methods of attacking and damaging such a blockchain, and show how to mitigate such risks. If we do nothing, the risk of failure is too large to accept.
We did not publish these concerns earlier because we needed to investigate them extensively and verify that they were not just speculations before sharing them to the community. The writing that follows consists of facts supported by evidence.
Much of the functionality of eosio is provided by plugins. They allow the system to produce blocks, connect to other nodes etc. The base eosio software includes many plugins. A block producing node should not run any unnecessary plugin on a live network, because some of them allow the chain to be hacked. Some of these plugins should never be exposed on a publicly accessible node.
One particular plugin we have noticed is the net_api plugin, which provides an api which can be used to control the plugin remotely. If this API is exposed on a public network then anyone with the ability to connect to this network can tell the block producers to disconnect from, or connect to, any other machine. This does not require anything close to a botnet. Without even being a part of the eos-bios network, a mac mini could disconnect every peer in the network.
Allowing this vulnerability on the live network could mean that an attacker can stop the chain from function properly and even partition the nodes so that eventually they stop. The Ghostbusters team noticed the vulnerability early on in the design of eos-bios and reported it to EOS Canada but no changes were made. This is one reason that we cannot support the launch using eos-bios.
Run command:
Returns you a list of responses like following for each node: Next get a list of peers only: And disconnect each peer: One could eventually force the connection to any other peer using, also increasing risks of network instability:
So should we be panicking and throwing out all of our tokens? Definitely not. As much as we have investigated and tested the potential security risks associated with launching the network, we have also experimented and discussed about solutions to the problems above.
Given the fact that EOS software has not been securely vetted and BP node stores sensitive producer private keys, we have to take extra measures for securing those producing nodes. Ideally no public Internet access should be allowed to BP nodes while allowing meshing between BP nodes. Hence we propose using secure peer to peer communication between BP nodes via point-to-point secure tunnels using the open source WireGuard kernel based VPN software.
Each BP node will have 1 or more full nodes that it establishes secure connection to. Those full nodes will be exposed on open Internet protocol and available for access for overall Blockchain network. BP node should not expose it’s non-VPN IP address to the open Internet access. Also for fault-tolerance BP node should establish several trusted connections to other nodes.
We are 100% committed to launching, and supporting, a stable and resilient EOS mainnet. Given the facts stated above, and insecure nature of eos-bios boot process, our community of BPs is strongly advocating against using at as standard launch procedure as it exposes a complete chain to an attack by anyone.
We, as a community, consider it our duty to ensure that the EOS mainnet is secure and resilient. Using the eos-bios process will create unnecessary risks for the EOS Blockchain launch and ultimately all EOS token holders. As any negative press on insecurities in EOS Blockchain launch or failed attempt to launch the Blockchain will have a negative impact on EOS price and reputation.
Therefore we believe will be in all stakeholders interests to bring down any insecure and unstable network, using above methods we have highlighted, before any malicious third party takes advantage of such insecurity. We will simultaneously endeavour to introduce security improvements into launch and operational processes.
The security imperatives cannot be ignored and, given the stakes, must viewed as the paramount consideration.
cleos -u http://peer-host-name:port net peers {
"peer": "",
"connecting": false,
"syncing": false,
"last_handshake": {
"network_version": 1206,
"chain_id": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"node_id": "b92b2b7d8835e46e2fed97f5eebda31faea63fd07cc40ad52f132254f22cac8e",
"key": "EOS1111111111111111111111111111111114T1Anm",
"time": "1527171594944050635",
"token": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"sig": "SIG_K1_111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111116uk5ne",
"p2p_address": "reach.me.example.com:9876 - b92b2b7",
"last_irreversible_block_num": 57,
"last_irreversible_block_id": "000000391a9439aaa2864d9807965bc84865cdd15c4a0a3d0ae3c7e54a85a38f",
"head_num": 300,
"head_id": "0000012c9826a4f37db5e5c8b4790acad70c01188aee8e7b7330790937a93cdd",
"os": "linux",
"agent": "\"EOS Example\"",
"generation": 2
}
cleos -u http://peer-host-name-or-IP:port net peers | grep peerscleos -u http://peer-host-name-or-IP:port net disconnect host:portcleos -u http://peer-host-name-or-IP:port net connect host:port