This is the 3rd occasion, you previously marked one of my other photos as a breach which it was not. You can use the same image so long as the post is different which I did.

Can you please elaborate on which of the previous 2 investigations we were incorrect?
They appear valid to me.

Or recycling post? (Our comment was correct. It was a double post. Although you did it by accident)
@melbourneswest/beer-saturday

The previous photography plagiarism post? (Unless it is your photo published in curated photography tag, the investigation was valid)
@melbourneswest/good-night-rest-up-monday-is-over

We explained how authorship and copyright works and what publishing now own photography in curated tags work.
Please do not publish photography plagiarism.