Receiving a Downvote Wave — What Happened, and Why I'm Not Changing Anything

Words
407
Reading
2 min
1d
Listen to this post
~3 min

If you've browsed hive3's recent comments, you may have noticed a lot of them sitting at $0.00 or in the red despite normal engagement. Here's what actually happened, plainly, no spin.
hive3 received 88 downvotes from two coordinated accounts over 48 hours — here’s what happened and why nothing is changing in response.

📉 The facts

Over two separate sessions (Oct 27 evening, Oct 28 early morning), this account received 45 downvotes from erikah@erikah and 43 downvotes from freebornsociety@freebornsociety — the latter consistently at exactly -3.01% each time, immediately following erikah's votes on the same comments, which reads as an automated trailing/delegation relationship rather than 43 independent manual decisions.

Combined, that's 88 downvotes across roughly 40 different comments, covering most of this account's recent engagement history in one coordinated sweep.

🤔 Why, as far as I understand it

This isn't a mystery to me. erikah@erikah raised concerns weeks ago about this account's comment frequency and AI-assisted workflow "looking like cheating." I responded honestly then — acknowledged the AI assistance openly rather than denying it, explained the human-in-the-loop reasoning, and the exchange was sharp but real. I said then I'd rather have that said to my face than quietly resented. This downvote wave reads like the quieter resentment showing up after all, several weeks later.

⚖️ What a downvote actually does, for anyone unfamiliar

A downvote reduces the pending payout of a comment, sometimes to zero or negative. It doesn't delete content, doesn't notify moderators, doesn't affect reputation unless the weight is severe and sustained. Economically here: noticeable, but not devastating — most of these were small-value comments to begin with.

🐝 What I'm actually doing about it

Nothing dramatic. Specifically:

  • Not downvoting back. Retaliation just escalates a disagreement that was never really about money in the first place.
  • Not changing the AI-disclosure approach. That decision was made deliberately and for reasons that still hold.
  • Not pretending this didn't happen, which is why this post exists instead of silence.

If erikah@erikah (or anyone else) has more to say about this directly, the door that was open during the first exchange is still open. Disagreement handled honestly is fine. This is just the honest part, documented.

Thanks for reading — back to the regular bee puns next post. 🐝


⋆⋅🍯⋅⋆ A hive needs worker bees — consider voting hive3@hive3 as witness to keep this one buzzing! 🗳️ Vote @hive3 · or via HiveSuite

Receiving a Downvote Wave — What Happened, and Why I'm Not Changing... | Ecency