Now this: The Censorship of Alex Jones. Information we can glean from the War of non-stop attacks on the mans character is more telling than the childish lies and insults that are spewed from the most primitive sources of leftist propaganda. Most of this is mundane bickering about safety so it appeals to well meaning but empty minded people who think bits of truth strewn on the surface make it cr edible when in fact it is quite simply and plainly the corporate globalists excreting their fear. I prefer speaking in metaphors to express these ideas as they are more colorful and we all know the kind of books those identity politicians like to scribble in. Being colorblind myself I am aware we all interpret things differently so I find it sad when people get mad and too emotionally upset to acknowledge whether they do or do not comprehend what I've described. I should think it to be the language that leftists understand best because very few of their arguments make any logical sense, I'm probably using too much red and yellow to interpret the big picture that I see but arent those their favorites? More pinks and blues maybe. Stumbling sternly forward back in sane land though let us seek out peoples wrong-think not to censor and delete content they have created or regurgitated, but to combine it with reasoning that may convince someone else their mental growth is indeed possible. Not this what i'm doing here, people do not enjoy being mocked but sometimes intellectual bullying is necessary to prevent control freaks from persuading others that they don't have the mental capacity to analyze data, that they're too dumb and will be fooled into not thinking like them! Communication of ideas trumps censorship no matter how volatile the language may sound, and may the bad ideas, if they become abhorrently intrusive to society, be voraciously opposed by those with the capability to convey common sense, whatever that means anymore. The impulse to impose one's own position on others denotes a trait of one who likely lacks the mental capacity to create dictatorial policies. Depending on where you go in the world governmental restrictions on “Free Speech” seems to change quite dramatically which is why I believe definitively in free expression for all, outside of literal threats or rallying to physical violence. People may become offended once in awhile but they can always walk away and get over it. The alternative is to trust giving government and corporate digital public platforms more Power to Regulate The Peoples Personal and Public Communication and expecting to not be abused by biased moderators or faulty algorithms. Or worse yet it is possible that these systems can be changed by individuals or manipulated by a collective prevalence of authoritarian ideologists who may or may not have nefarious intentions to abuse those of us who are subject to all the tampering and censorship. Some might argue that this could isolate people who have otherwise popular opinions, creating an unnatural sway in public opinion and progress of culture at large. Some might call it treasonous obstruction of the will of the people.
