If you were replying to me, I would say you (benevolently) misread my words, and thought I was saying "There is no law" in regards to Monckton's Law. (If you even did misread them.) But I was not! =p (Although I still think what you said is technically correct nonetheless.)

And that's for your benefit, because I was actually referring to the very LEGAL laws that Monckton would fear most. THOSE are the laws I would call false laws. Monckton is cool with me, at least as far as I know him from this single post.

So I am on Monckton's side here, and I still agree with you that there's no need to consider Monckton's Law an unbreakable law. Nor would I disparage it either. I'd only disparage unjust legal law which tries to oppress and bind us, as well as the unjust modification or enhancement of words, in the way that you mentioned these villains will often do.