I've become simply terrified of words themselves. Since when did "animal growls" and utterances have such -complex- meaning? Well, that's what these things are, animal growls, and putting them into written form is quite the feat. I feel as if there is a certain "vibration frequency" of growl or sound that can make certain words sound more menacing or threatening.

A word such as skazer or raxist sounds more frightening than a word like floober or blum.

Here are a few simple ideas I've had:

It is possible to tell a lie composed only of true statements.
It is possible to tell a truth by only saying false statements.
It is possible to make good things sound bad by highlighting true aspects of them in a negative sense. And vice versa.

Furthermore, acknowledgement is just as much an idea as anti-acknowledgement. I support what you said about that. To refuse to acknowledge certain ideas or words, you put up a defense against it. For example, I will never ever again take a word like "sexism" or "racism" seriously, and I will instantly cast down the user of that word as a false person using false words in order to falsely attack an argument or statement I'm making.

Those words are only a few examples, but there are certain types of ideas or phrases that I will refuse to acknowledge and will instantly become viciously harsh against, if someone tries to use them against me. I have come to the conclusion that words themselves are false, and that their meaning in the psychological sense is actually a pure abstraction of not just definitional meaning, but also purpose and intent of the speaker.

Animal growls. Roars. Whimpers. Hisses. Screams. Screeches. Just more sophisticated.

A hostile speaker will say things that aren't meant to bring enlightenment, knowledge, diplomacy, truth, or justice, but instead, will say things that I will have to look out for as containing "viral proteins."

My psychological immune system will immediately notice traces of known memetic viruses, and will attack immediately, as if the person speaking them was an infected body, capable of literally sickening me and causing me to become mentally ill.

But it is beyond obvious that "leftists can't meme" is not a joke. It is that people who are currently infected with an active virus can't come up with their own viruses and memes. They can only replicate the idea that they're infected with. This happened to the Right before too, with its over-use of Christianity.

Every religion; every politic; every ideology; every word, is as potent as any sort of information. Genetic code, at its core, is information. Transmitting malignant information includes biological viruses, as well as mental illnesses.

This means that non-biological mental illnesses can be spread, and that it is extremely important and vital to be on your guard for NEW ONES.

The most horrible thing is that these memetic viruses are likely deliberately devised, and it is very likely that the creators will completely abandon currently infected hosts, and do so at the hosts' expense. What I mean is that now that the left leg's boot has come down hard, I will fully expect to see the right boot begin to lower, and to do so, the left will be disparaged and mocked openly, just as we're doing now. We're the vanguard, weakening the current memetic virus, and once the viral-source notices, a new virus, distinct from the old, will be created and disseminated.

There's no reason for this to have evolved naturally. It can look completely and absolutely separate from the previous one, or even appear to be an opposition of the previous incarnation. I fully expect the next memetic virus to once more parade itself around as freedom; something good and wholesome sounding, but at its core, malignant and lethal. Never forget the 30 years war in Europe in the 1600's.

Due to the memetic virus mutating slightly, wars were had, not for food or land, but for merely killing. Crops were not taken, but burned. Water was poisoned. People would kill each other over mere ideas, mere religions, and kill in such a way that could only prove that killing was the actual purpose of these religions. There was nothing to gain. No one could possibly have any use for these wars, other than puppet-masters at the top.

They indoctrinate every child in their institutions. There is no reason to think that this sort of concept is by accident. They know what they are doing, and it is extremely deliberate, even down to the idea of trying to get as many people into massive college debt as possible. The desire to censor every idea that is dangerous to them is as present as their desire to propagate every idea that is dangerous to us.

Why do they see us as an enemy? I don't understand why they hate us. I don't even know who they are. They don't even know who I am. I can't understand their motives because nothing they do makes sense. It's just so maliciously pointless. Don't they understand that evolution is true? They are entrenching themselves into a position while using tactics that over time, all survivors will become immune to.

The enlightenment never stopped. It just slowed after the previous memetic virus called "Christianity" was defeated and made considerably more harmless. But is it?

Anti-christ is a word I keep hearing, among other religious utterances. And that will be a poisoned thorn within we the people. Those religions are previous memetic infections, and using those words means using words and ideas that many people are immune to. For each person that compares these "elites at the top" to evil angels or devils or other supernatural entities, our arguments look that much more primitive and foolish to a person who is not in that specific religion.

Religions also evolve, just as all ideas do, and evolution means branching out due to mutations. This means that in the eyes of a late-stage religious person, nearly everyone else could be seen as a heretic. You would never meet a person who would agree with you 100% regarding matters of religion. We are free to believe what we want, thus, every person's idea of both God and good and evil, will differ. To the point that the absolutism of God itself is on a spectrum from 0 to infinity, in such a way that it will not provide a cohesive "We The People."

All you have to do is not be in that religion, and every reference to revelations or doomsday or 616 666 the number of the beast is the number of a man and that man walks among us in the flesh of a human but contains the soul of a demon; is actually just nonsense, however true it might seem when we look at what malicious actions are taken towards us, for seemingly no reason.

Unlike purely evil demons, these humans have achievable agendas and goals, and there is no guarantee that any god can save us. No; it is up to us, and thus we stand alone against what truly appears to be an enemy from the darkest pits of hell itself, which utters beautiful lies, and makes truth appear hideous.

May we prevail.