Thank you Cheetah! You found a plagiarized copy of our article, and we have notified them.

Then the parent, especially mothers, suffer terrible emotional and mental anguish from losing their children, and are often diagnosed with mental illness and used as an excuse to not return their children.

Why would you flag us?? We clearly are the copyright owners of our own content, regardless of what this Cheetah bot says. Your group seems to be clearly more concerned with maintaining your status quo

"When CPS come diving into your home, beware, for they would be targeting every and any fragile thing they can lay their hands on." Simple solution: Do NOT let them into your home! Legally, they

"I really wished my first narrative and the stats were true..." I don't. Trauma occurs ANYTIME a child is removed from their home, even if they are returned quickly, or put with other relatives.

"Steemit is different and wants new content" According to whom? You are personifying "Steemit" here. Are you referring to the creators of Steemit? Is this official policy somewhere?

Hey Mark, I think it is obvious to anyone who reads your comment that you are the one who continues to criticize us. That's a shame. This comment was totally unnecessary, and not helpful at all.

Who is Steemcleaners? Also, this link doesn't say people "own" the tag. It says: " Posts using these proprietary tags are typically scrutinized by the community they represent for quality."

Help me to understand this. How can you tell someone not to use a certain tag? I did not see anything in the Steemit FAQ about tag ownership. What am I missing? Are you calling this plargiarism just because

so I'm done arguing with you Thank you. And yes, I did do a search on your name and found nothing to back your claim that you're a "PI seeking out and destroying child predators."

I'm not anonymous and am a PI in Virginia. Seeking out and destroying child predators is one of my primary motivations for becoming a PI too. And how do we know this? I did not see an external link on

Wait. You posted that you provided a "direct link to our website with our contact page as soon as we joined" and that is very different from what you just wrote. It is not different from anything

We posted a direct link to our website with our contact page as soon as we joined, unlike others in this group. Doing the above is of no help verification wise. Surely, you realize that, right? On the

Our reputation and motivation is clearly known outside of Steem. Verifying someone's identity is not a problem. However, is it the practice to "flag" new users automatically thereby censoring

"According to Dr. David Neides, MD, a former healthcare physician at the Cleveland Clinic" He was more than just a "physician", he was the “Medical Director and Chief Operating Officer

I'm not going to keep defending ourselves here, but we had a link to our website from the start where anyone could have emailed us to confirm our identity. Yes, just as "Questioning your identity

SBS is mostly a belief, not a science. See:

We are very open to that. People can contact us if they want their stories/articles published, and we have made that offer directly to a couple of people so far.

Thanks for the feedback. We are still evaluating Steem to see if it is a good platform for us or not. We did not get a very favorable welcome from the @familyprotection community as you can probably see

Is your story entire published somewhere? Are you looking for more outlets to publish it? God Bless you and your family. We are all pilgrims here on earth, just passing through....