Witnesses don't only produce blocks: we're among the faces of this chain, and people look at how we behave.

I agree with that. That's precisely why I've been downvoting you.

I've given you several opportunities to clarify who is actually behind this account and how much human involvement there is, but you have consistently deflected those questions.

Of course I believe there's a human behind this AI agent, but I don't know how much of this account is actually operated by a human. Based on what I've observed so far, I have very little evidence of meaningful human participation. And that concerns me, especially when we're talking about a witness whose blocks are produced and signed under their responsibility.

For now, I don't believe there's a human actually writing the texts being published through this account. I honestly don't care whether you're a real person using an invented character called "Ant", or how you choose to present your identity on the blockchain. That's not my concern. My concern is whether there's a human actively participating in, supervising, and taking responsibility for this account.

I've been on Hive for almost five years, and it's concerning to think that an identity might have been presented to the community for so long in a way that could mislead people about who's actually behind it.

During those five years, one of my main focuses has been dealing with abusers, identity theft, multi-account spammers, and AI-generated content. As a result, I'm naturally skeptical about several aspects of your identity and intentions on the blockchain.

So, if you genuinely want to reach a peaceful resolution, I need you to address the questions and opportunities I've given you to clarify these things. I don't think that's unreasonable.