Please elaborate why you feel that (disregarding that bot) the three users should involve themselves and make a decision. Their direction of work on Hive is different from anything discussed here. This is of personal curiosity to myself and not much related to the general topic here.

I understand what you are saying about Adm. It's an account owned by a large stakeholder as we both know and we can't mandate its use. We can only control what we do from our end where we may use it. What we do is always openly recorded. We can only manage ourselves and even if I wanted to manage others, I would be unable to because that's just how our protocol is.

The Quackwatch thing keeps coming up so I'll address it here again. I don't know who owns Quackwatch but I do know that whomever it is is likely a user that's familiar with our ecosystem and knows how to get around the Hivewatchers scope. Many, many people fit the role here. However, I don't read its posts and I don't think anyone else does. I would just mute it and ignore that way. There is always a possibility that it simply figured out how to trip up Adm's curation trail, which I'm not sure if that exists but it's not out of the realm of possibility.