I've been a passive member for a while in the Steemit community, after having joined in February and, after experiencing the platform for a while. I mainly come on to try to curate posts and then, go back to my daytime software projects and job-hunting business.
Hardfork 20 has come and gone, is tested and implemented. I noticed a few changes, and will like to seek the opinion of others on what they've noticed so far, with respect to the changes in the community. The aspiration of Steemit Incorporated is that the new changes create a more conducive atmosphere to reflect the objectives of the platform. Do you think these objectives have been met and/or improved upon, or do you think Steemit has failed and these changes are not needed and/or unhealthy for the platform?
Here are my few observations:
When a user applies the Hide resteems function, only authored posts from other users can then be displayed as resteemed posts are immediately filtered out of view. This allows users more control of their account (view).
A cross-section of critics had criticised Steemit founder, Ned Scott for what they perceived as abandonment of the platform, implied from his not blogging on the platform via his account . Whether they consider the platform interactivity modifications satisfying or not, is another question begged.
Steemit data harnessing and distribution across its blockchain seems to be a bit more efficient. I do not have scientific data to prove this, it is just a conclusion I drew from the look and feel of the website since after hardfork. This might be also due to the controlled rates of data transfer across the community. With a combination of the algorithm that regulates the Voting Power (Mana) and the introduction of Resource Credits, data transfer was bound to be more controlled, thereby creating an atmosphere for improved efficiency in data flow.