I hear many times, and what is interesting in churches, one, two and enough; they say to me: you will not remember them anyway, in a moment you will not be able to remember their name, let alone what was inside. Maybe if I would go into every temple I came in one by one. I visit only those chosen by me, those I read about, or those I watched on films. I go armed with some kind of knowledge. I do not need to know who built and on whose behalf, what are the dimensions and what they call the chapels, how many altars they have, but about each of the visited shrines of faith I know something that pulls me to him. During one of your stays in one of the museums or perhaps palace complexes, your guide gave us good advice; try to remember at least one thing; painting, sculpture or other exhibit, and then such a visit will not confuse you with another one.
I perfectly remember the names of temples visited by me, the appearance of their interiors, as well as the statues or pictures there, of course not all, but those that were a pretext for a visit for a given visit.
Roman churches are like art galleries and are free galleries. Priceless paintings and sculptures for which admirers would be willing to pay dearly for the admission ticket, here are available to everyone, almost without restrictions.
An additional advantage of watching works of art in temples is the fact that they are located in the place for which they were created, in the environment for which they were incorporated. Rarely was the artist creating a work with a view to displaying it in museums or galleries, where it is one of thousands of exhibits.
Archcathedral of Saint. John the Baptist in Wroclaw
Greetings
I vote for them:
@c-squared@TheRealWolf
@roelandp
@blocktrades@TeamSteem
@blockbrothers
@quratorMy work without them would not make sense, thank you for support.
