"at first i thought adding more people to the twitter team was a nice idea but now that i think about it, it will actually serve to centralize power around those approved by the poll since they can

It is in the nature of a functioning democracy to advocate one's own belief. The merit of the belief is to be determined by the public. By flagging our post you aim to hinder others from reading it. We

Please accept our apologies if you felt that this post was directed against all "No" voters. This is not our intent. Our aim is to highlight that a significant amount of the No vote shares are

Thank you for your comment. To rephrase: our aim is to highlight the dichotomy of a democratic voting process, where: the vote is about de-listing a project delivering unfair magnitudes some are voting

Please consider that for some projects the reason for de-listing is indeed to address the unfair MAG allocation they cause. (e.g the recent poll for de-listing SourceFinder). Hence the proposed

why the name calling?

We should be putting our efforts to free the masses from pool slavery instead of offering them incremental improvements. The real problem is the pool itself. Marginal improvements to the pool will only

256 grc

As we pointed out earlier, the current voting system incentivizes members to buy GRC (against fiat or other crypto) to increase their voting weight. This favors disproportionately the rich over the poor.

Fellow Gridcoin workers, Many have expressed their doubts about our subsidy distribution. Some have even raised suspicions regarding a scam. We have therefore decided to push the first distribution date

BOINC is not purely science, that's why we have the whitelisting process where the community decides which projects are worthy of being rewarded GRC.

If you have already voted with your coins you can incentivize others (in need) by contributing to the GRC-LF pool. Buying more coins to vote does not have the same community effect where the more wealthy

The aim is to reward altruistic behavior and incentivize voting. Not everyone has the same community consciousness. A little nudging goes a long way.

We do understand your concern. However, from a game theory perspective, a scammer would stand to gain more if there was no 25 percentile barrier. You can follow the re-distribution as it takes place on