Author of this content has low reputation.
RE: RE: Refuting the Claims of Stew Peters: A Detailed Examination
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Refuting the Claims of Stew Peters: A Detailed Examination

Words
193
Reading
1 min
1y

I am a firm believer that Stew Peters is just controlled opposition. I do appreciate the invite but your refutes of using three letter agencies is just ridiculous to me. You either believe in the grand conspiracy JFK spoke about or you do not. I am what would be considered on the extreme fringe of conspiracy theories. As in no planes hit the towers on 911 and all the videos taken that day were Jews. Coincident Zapruder who took the JFK video, that was obviously doctored, was also a Jew.
These are people that I can not defend.
If someone opens their eyes and just observes it is quite obvious a plane cannot slice into a building and the explosive devices use is observably true.
If someone is not awake by now, that is their choice.
The wing even disappears before hitting the building.
Observable CGI.
Some people choose not accept reality.
This cost me too much pain in my life over the last 14 years to join in a never ending debate against people that defend the Jews.
I prefer concentrating on situation and people that I can help.
Best of luck.
naudet_1.gif