Talking about Brother Eli sermon about how we can interpret the scripture. What is written is in Matthew 21:13, which is treated as a special statement, but it's not depicted as a special statement, but it's just like a direct quotation, which is required for the feeling of revelations from Isaiah and Jeremiah.
Jesus said it is written. He was not there to introduce that new doctrine. He was pointing us back to what the Father had already spoken in the world. When we talk about that temple, which is the den of thieves, it shows that this problem was not just offering a self-merit, but the worshipers corrupted the churches and the pastor turned it into a profit-making scheme.
A place that was meant for prayer has been taken to be a business hub. Jesus' reaction was rooted in long-standing faith. And then, his pleasure of converting the temple into a marketplace. There has been some discussion about Christ, where the calendar should have been debated. Because this is not important to the human system, but they are religious practices, so timekeeping can be flawed.
Scripture has remained consistent. This challenges both the listener to return to what it is written, and to examine our tradition carefully. And keep God's heart simple. Not convenience or a commercial place.
