René Descartes “ Rationalism “ // Philosophy // Analysis

I greet to the whole platform of Steemit, he considers to Descartes, as the founder of the rationalism, for the current rationalist philosophy it bases on the reason, it is the only faculty that can lead the men to the knowledge, in such a way that the proper experience of the empiricism, is based on the perceptions of the senses, that can be deceitful, Descartes tackled a position from his formation, where he was thinking that all the sciences rest on the methods of the philosophy, and this one does not contain any more that you doubt and treatises, only the mathematicians convince for his certainty and the evidence of his reasons.

René Descartes (1596-1650), source of image of mastery of Wikimedia Commons

In the scientific field discarding simplified the system of algebraic notations, created the analytical geometry, also it was stimulated by work of laws of optics and base of the determinism sat, nevertheless, his most ambitious target was to construct the universal and only method for all the sciences, which it exhibited in his speech of the method. Descartes to prepare a philosophical original system, doing without any previous philosophy, doubted everything her up to accepted, looking for an evidence, which was rationally undoubted, that's why I argue it as rationalism, to establish his system, try to find out if it gave it was a reference, but it discarded it on having considered, that the man is too limited, to reach god with the reason and only it can come up to him for the faith, with what it determined god can never be a rational reference.

Only let's think and let's analyze the following thing, Descartes applied the method of methodical doubt, because in doubting everything, even the proper reality objetiva, that it can be a trick of the senses, alone a thing cannot doubt, of that the subject, which he doubts of if same he thinks for only of existing, as queriendo to say fodder and then I exist. This evidence provides the characteristics, that has to have any acceptable idea of clear form and of distinction, is where the Cartesian method proposes to proceed for chains of reasonings, since the geometers do, always respecting the rules of the method, to give an evidence, order, division and totality of the rationalism.

Is necessary to consider, when Descartes was arming the philosophical method, I sail in the following current, so that it understood it, the knowledge I can say part of for certain ways, which have led to certain considerations and maxims, with which I have formed a method, in which it looks like a mechanism to increase gradually my knowledge and to raise it little by little up to the highest point of the rational thing, with a heat of mediocrity of ingenuity and only they it allow our life to obtain it. Down this context invades us to look with a philosophy of different actions and that treats at least an extreme satisfaction of the progress, in the fundamental of the thought, sustained in an investigation of the truth, which could form a judgment, this way taking the knowledge an as as counterfoil of generating ideas, for establezca a new way of collective universal instruction.