Probably wrong direction
Kinda weird to attack single project by changing general rules...
Possible it's better to discuss proposals in more general approach as whole, not by singles, especially with change like that.

We all know that governance activity on blockchains is very low, it's relatively hard or even impossible to get proposal accepted without any politics, people completely don't care, people with stake often care less and need to be approached.

Here we already have much bigger problem with monopoly and even farming dhf, some people already know they can make proposal after proposal for anything and still will be voted, some of them might be not aware of farming they do, it's just opportunity you need to take. We need more diversification in proposals, more discussion about all the proposals, more chances for people who didn't farm dhf already for years, trying everything possible even leofinance. Even if they fail, we tried.

Overpricing proposals is another issue, we just need to agree it's happening and approach all the people creating proposals and have a discussion, like I already wrote above it's weird discussion with focus on single project when problem is general.

Very interesting way to tell someone they need hive logo :D
I need Hive logo too actually on my app, too bad no one told me, learning this way...

I tested it all.
I have 3-4 years old application, which is already very advanced, built for hive users not personal profit, 5-10x cheaper proposal than most of the other proposals, actually cost almost nothing compared to others, still didn't go through, seems like I need to beg whales to get it through. Most likely someone else with more hive friends will do weak copy of my application and do proposal for 10x more $ and it will be accepted first day.

Governance is hard.