I like the price stability of CTPSB and slow-growth model. If a diesel pool (as much as I like them) would make it more volatile and jeopardize the slow-growth model, I probably wouldn't be a big fan.

I don't mind the name, but like someone else said, I understand it could be a problem in attracting new investors, so a rebranding could be useful.

As for making CTPSP part of Liotes, it depends on what you have in mind and what would that entail. Would that just mean co-managing with Zoltan of the existing (possibly "upgraded" project), or a major restructuring, where CTPSP funds slowly move into a part of Liotes, and holders of CTPSB receive an airdrop of LEN or LENM as compensation? I would prefer the project to remain with a distinct identity, separately or within the Liotes project.