RE: RE: Dan Larimer Cannot Censor Accounts with 51% of Hashes
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Dan Larimer Cannot Censor Accounts with 51% of Hashes

futurethinker(61)
Published in
#eos
Words
70
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
8y

But there is a catch that dan@dan completely ignores: finality of transactions is not a function of the blockchain like dan@dan wishes it to be, it is a function of the real-world entities that interact with the blockchain.

Could you explain what his finality concept means? As I understand it during a 51% attack when it is kept long enough, people will be "forced" to move to the longer chain.

eos
via steemit
This post was published via steemit. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.
1
@futurethinker: But there is | Ecency