Hello my dear @culgin, thanks for your kind response, very clear your explanation. Thank you!
It is not because I only give you a score of 30/100 for this article, it is really because there are a limited number of votes I can give per day. Every vote I cast consumes my voting power which will only replenish 20% per day. Considering that, I have to "ration" my voting activities because there are many good articles that deserve my vote.
I think that most people use that criterion to vote in favor of any publication they consider interesting, now I understand this more clearly, and it is possible that all this is due to the need to ration the votes as you are affirming.
Will AI replace humans one day? It's hard to say without a specific date. I think it probably won't happen in the near future. But who knows what will happen in 50 years or 100 years :)
I think the same, in the near future it seems that this will not be possible, I also think about the feeling and everything that explains in the publication that there are things unique to humans that artificial intelligence can hardly overcome. Sure, I can be wrong!
Thanks friend.
@fucho80
RE: Artificial intelligence, low ratings and voting criteria in steemit