The paper that is being represented is not by this person. S. V. Subramaniancorresponding and Akhil Kumar wrote it. Never said they were antivaxx. I see nothing that shows me this OP was written by a doctor or this person. They have determined long ago the % at risk, which is extremely small. Maybe look for the data.... instead of grasping the question without actually learning. The OP is clearly antivax and time and time again shows it in their account. Vaccines will stop this "carnage". Thats the point. Anyone saying "im not antivaxx" and they push antivaxx conspiracies/disinfo, like how you think we dont know the risks and the % of said risks are low. As for McCullough, he literally that, pretend he isnt against vaccines then pushes false infomation and bullshit remedies, like hydroxychlorquine. Saying he isnt antivaxx is liek saying some one isnt racist but then pushes some racist theories.
https://factcheck.afp.com/us-cardiologist-makes-false-claims-about-covid-19-vaccination
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/07/right-wing-vaccine-rebellion-on-campus
Just a sample of how he misleads and spread dangerous disinfo.
McCullough is a hack. He fired for spreading the disinfo he has spread. Vaccines are safe. If you feel unsure maybe go speak with an actual professional on the subject? McCullough being a doctor of one thing wouldnt even make him an expert in the subject, plus all the many times he has show to push half assed research and up right falsities. Alt facts arent facts.
RE: New Study Shows No Reduction In COVID19 Transmission Due to COVID Shots: "sole reliance on vaccination... needs to be re-examined"