It is not "copypasta spam" unless it is reposted multiple times. A single post with an added source is considered a sourced post, and shared content from other social media.
You do not wish to acknowledge its value in social media, and that is your opinion. However, that is an opinion and not objective fact (as opposed to direct plagiarism, direct spamming, etc.). Are opinions of content value part of the purview for hivewatchers?
Once again, if you wish to be part of the curation team for the community, you are welcome to discuss this with us, and we can always put it to a vote within our community. Otherwise, you are intruding into our community and making value decisions based upon your established opinion and overriding the rest of the community, seeing as your vote canceled out all of the others which were positive.
I ask you kindly to either respect our own community guidelines, speak with us so that we may come to a conclusion before you start overriding our votes, or to kindly leave us alone to continue functioning as a cohesive community.
RE: Imad Wasim retires from international cricket