I think the idea of leaving would extend completely through Hive, including Threads Have to clear myself of the entire thing

The FreeCompliments Community Rewards System is coming to an end due to abuse by Hive Oligarchs! Thank you to the people who helped build the community. More information in the post inked in the comment

I want to use these returns to help out newbies. A large portion of what I earn goes to the community accounts. The community accounts (which, by the way, actually don't have much delegated to these projects,

Attacking my integrity as a community builder, then proceeding to destroy the earnings of the FC community account because you have a problem with me is being nice? You literally set out to destroy myself

It's now unfortunately gone beyond the realm of bad intentions. He is intent on zeroing out the posts of the community account, thus there's no way we can sustain HSBI rewards going forward. That's so

Sadly, it appears this time the FC Community is losing the battle. There's no way we'll be able to provide HSBI rewards any longer.

There's a difference between ignorance of an issue and simply having a different opinion on how an alternate form of curation can be used in a beneficial way. You like things your own way, and that's the

Based on the subsequent responses I've seen going around here, it's definitely not going to be resolved in favor of the community at all. Looks like it's over for me and the way I was running FC.

Dang it, that one flew right by me. You're right. Usually I'm better at catching sarcasm!

Appreciate your words, Rob. It's interesting how acidyo labels me as a the abuser when his own poshtoken is upvoting its own spam comments for hundreds of dollars per day, while I'm actually using the

I literally wrote within the same sentence that I used my own NEOXAG tokens for those, the ones that I earned on this account from my delegation. I didn't use the community account's NEOXAG for this. That

I do not engage with rude individuals. Go away.

So delegating to a single centralized entity (which votes on whomever it wants, usually within its own community regardless) is better than delegating to another centralized entity which votes on a potentially

Come on, this is such a biased comment. I absolutely considered and respected his point of view on manual curation, and openly acknowledged this. Of course there was a point. However, he simply refused

This is not correct because I'm not a delegation project. I'm someone who uses the delegation projects, which is what the primary gripe was about. He chose to downvote me, and subsequently the community,

Are you seriously defending a major account upvoting its own spam comments for hundreds of dollars? That's absolutely theft of the reward system. It's embarrassing that this is used as an example of "good

I'm not concerned about his downvoting me, but rather the community accounts. If he has a problem with me, then let him deal with me personally. Destroying the rewards that the community account was receiving