i had an idea for more liquid steem too some days ago.

https://steemit.com/steem-engine/@freddio/idea-for-new-steem-engine-token

I think long term the system needs to be more abuse save in code.

I do not believe that we can explain to millions of people how to use bitbots properly and how inflation and the reward pool works.

I think the system should stay simple so you can understand it in a few minutes.

People also do not understand the account creation cost money.

The free downvotes are a good start.

I think also 75% curator 25 author should be the best way to create a working system for 2 reasons.

Reason 1:

for an author, it is not the most profitable way to sell steem. it is worth gathering more steem and curating comentars and your own community.

So the incentive is greater to build your own communitie.

Since it is worth more for the author.

So, curating becomes extremely positive. At the moment you have the feeling you buy steem power to curate and the authors selling it. Price goes down Steem feels useless.

The second reason is that investors see more sense in buying Steem because it is based on a self-reinforcing effect.

In the long run, that should be the one that makes the most sense.

People always walk the path of least resistance like sheep staying in their fenced area. So the fence has to be built so that the way is good for everyone. Say the rules of the game should be changed.

I would be interested in your opinion.

best regards and have a nice day

@freddio