RE: RE: “Backchannels are important when the ‘FRANK’ itself is untrustworthy [BACON].” - Comms are OPEN
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: “Backchannels are important when the ‘FRANK’ itself is untrustworthy [BACON].” - Comms are OPEN

frankbacon(66)
Published in
QANON
Words
35
Reading
1 min
6y

Thank you! I appologize for the activity by that STALKER who keeps Spamming insane comments. He's jealous or something. Total freak though... I would avoid him (mute) move on.

As for your pup, Kindest Regards!

via hiveblog
This post was published via hiveblog. Ecency is not the originator or editor of this content and displays it for discovery purposes only.
0