You are now looking at credits per project, when in fact there are huge differences between subprojects and tasks done. Some tasks do not stress a GPU 100%, and running parallel tasks change results. Also

Yeah no problem. Maybe the "leave gridcoin alone" was the bit that throwed me off, you probably meant that "useless hashing leave grc alone" and not me. There's always a challenge

Yeah I'm wondering this also. I'm not aware of a way to edit project settings in grcpool.

I've also heard on multiple occasions that focusing on one project gives the best mag and GRC. Maybe people have mixed it up somehow?

I think the black/graylisting presented in the post I linked has good ideas, but many aspects like scientificity is hard to automatize. As I've said, the results of moo wont be scientific, but the process

These are good points. Most of the pioneering work for distributed computing has been done at the start of this RC5 project and the RC5 project before. My point was just that this project as a whole has

My main concern is that who has the expertise to answer the last two questions? Funnily, the answer for Moo! is yes for the both questions. It has contributed to a field of research (there are peer reviewed

As far as I know, breaking a code this hard has not been done, hence the historical part. You are right that it is not quaranteed to be newsworthy. As a scientist (a big data crunching oriented at that),

According to this, yes: "In May 2007, RSA Labs announced that Secret Key Challenge would be discontinued. Fortunately, due to the continued interest in our RC5-72 project we have decided to privately

Ahh, silly me, you have to use the hash and not the block number.

I get { "RollbackChain" : false } when trying to reorganize. What could be the problem?