There’s a problem here. The marketing agency made a claim and no one verified that.
The data exists tho, that post is driving 0 traffic (zero, nill, noppes, nada, zilch): https://simpleanalytics.com/leofinance.io/@schubes/lsmjyfnd?period=month&count=3
Ten times number of clicks for Pe is 10x0. At best 5 per month.
What that tool does is surface the highest ranked posts, but contrarily to webmasters console, it does not also match the posts against actual traffic/search clicks.
I know, I know... the game is about getting a base of thousands posts driving five clicks daily and then the social game and actual posts, as well as evergreen posts, on top of that.
But the fact is... no one validated the claim whether that post drives traffic. It doesn’t.
You don’t write to rank for topics which have less than 100 daily in trends.
I don’t think this needs further discussion. The data is out there and we should analyse more (DYOR) rather than just swallow claims.
RE: An SEO Lesson Gamified for the LEO Community