Well I guess the reason he doesent do all things he promised is the same reason all politicians dont manage to keep all promises. There is something called reality, which most politicians have to manage, in addition to their idea of a perfect society.

I guess who is a zionist depends on what you mean about a "zionist". If Benjamin Netanyahu is a zionist I think Trump is an Americanionist (or whatever way you spell it). If a zionist simply means youre a member of a ethinc or religious group all people in this world is a "ist" of some sort. It is the link between "bankers and zionist" I do not understand, and the impliatcation that they are all in favour of war.

What about Jeff Bezoz, worlds richest person. Not only is he rich but he also owns a company with detailed information on most inhabitants and their shopping habits. Do you think he have to bow for any bank, or is it the other way around? What about Elon Musk, he is an upcoming rich person, and if he succeed on his star-link project my guess is that he will be the next "worlds richest person". His power is not linked to money, but almost genius engineering and entrepreneur - skills. No bank can stop him! He will get founded in the stock market or similar institutions. Both these persons have lead companies that have profoundly changed the lifes of the consumers. Thats the reason they are rich, not some devious plan to make everybody go to war with each others.

And if war is such an important income for banks they are doing rather bad for the time beeing, in the historical perspective. There has never been a more peaceful era in the known history. Of course we have our wars, but at much smaller scale than earlier. Allthough I guess you have another theory, but the biggest war in history was not triggered by any zionists or banks, but simply by ideologies clashing together. These wars was far easier to start in the old days, when the economy was more "local". Nowadays most products you buy is a global cooperation. For instance, the computers we sit and type our messages on have components and technology from all over the world. A war in a region important for the supply of certain minerals, or if the general flow of goods and services stops up because of a war it would lead to less consumption of these goods, and therefore less money both for banks and shareholders. And nobody likes that. Sure, there are money to be made on wars, but there are much more money to be made on peace. Not because of good will or kindness, but because of a mechanism in the economy (called greed) I believe the trend of fever and fever wars will sustain.

Wars are always a result of recklessness from one or more parties. Israelis might be reckless and so can all other nation in this world be. There is also reckless people in all ethnic groups and in all professions. The question remains, why link zionists and bankers, and why claim that they are more eager to have wars? there is in my view no logical link, and I do not see that you have presented that either.