I think you are right to some degree. I was commenting in msp just the other day that if the 1990's feminist looked at today, they would acknowledge the christian coalition was right about the pron/abortion/birth control debates. I think there is a lot of misandry in your analysis. The women of pron are whores; they have their price. Theese men are attracted to these women, and I am sure most would like to know what it is like to be with a woman. Even if doing it legally in front of a camera isn't their forte, I am sure every major city has a market for high class hoes....of camera.
if Prostitution was legal, I would suspect there would be less virgins-but more men chronically depressed.
I do strongly agree that feminist really don't want men to form relationships or attachments with women, and with the house moving to reauthorize VAWA and the senate has no chance of blocking it, I expect things to just get worse. The feminist has really made it dangerous for men wanting to have a relationship; I mean at least a female spider will have the decency to bite your head off compared to what our government does to men. And what is happening in America, I don't think is much different than what was going on in Russia where the Russian Mafia controlled the prostituion rings. You basically have oligarchs making money off what the market considers the most physically desirable women, and we have a socioeconomic culture that not only is discouraging natural and healthy relationships-effectively driving demand to these immoral providers.
It is far worse, but it is extremely late so I must go.
RE: Big Porn wants minors and kids to get addicted to it young, similar to drug dealers giving you that first high for free