RE: RE: Epistemological embargo of the so called "third world"
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Epistemological embargo of the so called "third world"

Words
108
Reading
1 min
4y

For me the definition was always:

  • 1st World = "Us", aka. NATO and Industrialized Countries.

  • 2nd World = "Them", aka. Warsaw Pact and Soviet Satellites.

  • 3st World = Nations militarily/economically irrelevant and/or support neither side during the Cold War.

For that reason with the fall of Socialism in late 1980s and the desperate July Coup to Restore Communism that destroyed the idea of a "Soviet Federation" democratic country, the World could no longer be divided by the previous method, and so was created the idea of:

  • Developed Countries = former 1st World
  • Underdeveloped Countries = nations militarily/economically irrelevant
  • Emergent Countries = former underdeveloped countries in fast economic development
@fernandosoder: For me the definition | Ecency