After writing this i was watching some news about it and i could see he was unanimously voted by 8 Cambridge professors, i wonder if none of them read the work he had done, and if they did not, why? If they did, how did they not check for plagiarism? It is so mind boggling to me! I was always a consultant/innovation guy, if i lied about my skills and could not perform it would be obvious, seems that in academia you can be a dumb ass and still get ahead in life.