You can get the funding through SPS. It will not be easy, but if the community decides that we want Steem on a specific exchange and is willing to pay the price tag, then somebody like you should receive

I think steemchiller discovered another critical bug that you guys missed. When you post on 3speak with beneficiaries, no one voting that post gets curation. Can you check that? It might have something

Some of the volume is fake, so be aware of that. But I like your ideas for increasing visibility and tradeability of STEEM. Thanks for taking this one into your own hands. I think you are the right person

Your downvote power is the same as your upvote power, it just does not regenerate as fast as your VP. So it is currently approx. 0.08 up and down (in rshares) for a 100% vote. (on a post with more than

Wir haben den Fehler gefunden. Die Hauptursache liegt an den Posts auf 3speak mit beneficiaries. Es kommt nur bei diesen Posts vor und hat mit den downvotes auch nichts zu tun. Du scheinst nicht ganz zu

Please have a look at this the account @ insights All the time he is posting stolen quotes from the internet with a single pic (hopefully non-copyrighted, free stock photos but I don't know) And then he

Ich glaube ich habe des Rätsels Lösung gefunden. Witnesses haben noch nicht geupdated auf den patch. Der patch geht doch erst live wenn es eine supermajority gibt oder? Update: Es liegt warscheinlich doch

Gute Idee, aber du hast da einen Denkfehler. Selbst wenn man als letzter votet oder andere große Accounts vor mir gevotet haben, bekommt man trotzdem ein wenig curation, wenn man so viel SP hat wie ich.

was meinst du steckt dahinter? Nodes haben nicht richtig replayed? Another bug?

Jetzt ist die curation Berechnung ganz zerschossen. Ich habe zahlreiche Posts wo mir 0 curation angezeigt wird, der Post steht aber über 10$...

Yeah, they handled the bug perfectly fine, but with zero communication. That is unacceptable old STEEM behavior. Nobody should blame the downtime, but communication was horrible again... It is not that

It could still become a descending triangle if the price of BTC does not go below W (W would then be wave a of the triangle). But a wave 4 is very unlikely so I am not even considering the triangle as

UPDATE: Blocktrades is a top witness and just announced that funds are safe. Good to know.

Oops, thanks for the spoiler. No official statement from steemit yet that is was about the 'mildly non-linear curation curve'. Are funds safe?

He could still use his voting power to downvote even more... I am really not sure that it was communicated as only 2.5 regeneration rate. I think (and probably a lot of others too) thought it would be

I see that now, but it also means that you can do 12.5 downvotes in one day to destroy an account. Yeah sure, you use the downvotes of the next days, but this is very bad in my opinion. And I think the

This is your first wave A with subwaves: It starts with a clear 3 wave pattern so it can't be a zigzag (5-3-5)

That's impossible unless some else upvoted in the same time window.

Thanks for continuing the steem news!

My keychain addon is not working to support proposals on steampeak. Every other transaction works just fine. Do you have an idea what this could be?