Pretty much anyone that bought STEEM and powered it up has likely seen a decline in their "investment". I wouldn't take it very personal in that regard. One thing I notice though, you call downvotes "censorship" when your content has not been taken down or removed from the blockchain or pretty much any of the frontends. A few of your posts were probably downvoted into negatives which caused them to be "hidden" behind a button that users first had to click to read; but still, never were you censored.

This argument is made over and over, however, censorship is not absolute removal of information. Censorship is also suppression of information, which downvoting something and making it hidden does. It is also demonetization, something that has become a hot topic for social networks and content producers. Isn't Steem suppose to be an oasis from those kinds of things? I guess not...