Well I think its a great idea, why do you think our country has NEVER been directly invaded in the last 100 years, we've only had small skirmishes on our lands and seas by foreign troops (like Pearl Harbour attack), and we retaliated swiftly and strongly after the fact.

I know you can do this, but caring enough to write a detailed walkthrough is just cringe. You're a cringey moron.
Hey, I'm asserting some very clear points, that you have NO idea what you're talking about when it comes to weapons so don't even try to bring it up.

Colonel vindman was on the call, therefore it cannot be second-hand.

Vindman's testimony:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/full-transcript-of-testimony-of-lieutenant-colonel-alexander-s-vindman-white-house-ukraine-expert/6c7d991c-1916-47a2-a320-cfbbea54eb52/
Page 14:
Vindman - "I want the committee to know I am not the whistleblower who brought this issue to the CIA and the committee's attention. I do Not know who the whistleblower is, and I would not feel comfortable to speculate as to the identity of the Whistleblower."

He was listening into the call, and all he said was that he "THOUGHT" that what Trump said was wrong and that he was "concerned by the call", which led to him reporting it as it may affect US-Ukraine's partnership in the longrun, him reporting it was about protecting US interests in Ukraine. The interests that have been expanding before this impeachment ordeal ever took place. (PAGE 17+)

Enjoy this from Tim Pool!