I'm undermining it by arguing against its legitimacy.

You can't effectively subvert it if you don't have the passwords to the computers that give you access to what's being decided over your head. And if you have no practical way to resist if you disagree with the government's decisions.

Can I ask you if you were disobedient during the plandemic? Did you say ‘no’ to every single measure that came up during that time? If so, was it the case that

• either you had a strong protector at the top of the hierarchy in the company you worked for to cover your disobedience.
• Or you were the boss of a company yourself and pretended to play by the rules, but you would have had to force your employees to obey because you didn't know the traitor among them.
• Or, if such a cover-up was not possible, you were fired for not following the rules.
• Or you lived on welfare and somehow survived by keeping your head down.

You mention the Deep State. Do you really believe it's a bug, and not a feature?

I do.
And people also are split in how they see it. There is no unanimity to be found.

If you are a character who came to the top of a scene, and you do not like to have a shadow force giving you orders how to proceed within your top position, you'd rather would like to get rid of that shadow force instead of surrendering to it.

Trump is such a character. He likes to have power and so he sees it as a bug and not a feature. I would say that what he sees as a bug is way more influential than what the two of us see. Since he can create a movement and an atmosphere, which he clearly intends to do. So the question is still debatable, I think.