I cite facts, statistics, his own words to support my position. I don't use generalizations, broad terms. I just offer objective information to support my view.

Firstly, I am sure that data and statistics can be found for all preferences. As far as your stated sources are concerned, I'd wager that if you have the opposite preference - anti Biden - you'll find figures and data that run counter to them.
Since neither you nor I have the relevant insights into the physical books and balance sheets of the finance departments, and are not in a position to track them ourselves from an accounting point of view, the only way to express a preference is to use the sources you trust.
One's own attitude towards people and parties stands or falls with the corresponding trust or mistrust.

Secondly, all hard data is ultimately subject to interpretation - every scientist knows this. This is the linchpin of any understanding of the facts provided. How these multiple facts are put in relation to each other, in which graphic form they are presented, what wordings are used, all of this influences the perception of those who view them. It is no secret that interpretation and presentation are and have been manipulated, again, towards what one prefers.

Since you prefer to believe that your last four years as US citizens were better in terms of health, economy, debt, foreign relations, inner relations, fitness for presidency, etc. in comparison Trump vs. Biden, is, what you have accomplished, to substantiate your own point of view once again.

I personally don't buy it. I could be wrong, but so could you.