I went down the rabbit hole a bit regarding RFID chip technology and emerged after two hours with the conclusion that things are unstoppable.

People who grow up in affluent societies develop a kind of paranoia, in my opinion. All control and tracking methods are based on the greatest possible future threats and argue on the basis of killings that have already occurred, such as terrorist attacks. With all negative assumptions made as ‘very likely’ and therefore ‘potentially dangerous’, as well as positive assumptions as ‘demonstrably useful’ and ‘potentially protective’.

None of these assumptions deal with the generally peaceful people in the centre, who pay no attention to one or the other and are therefore considered ignorant by both camps.
In their favour, I rather suspect a kind of unconscious intuition that human beings are ultimately constantly entangled in contradictions and that there is an inherent paradox at the heart of things. This dilemma becomes more pronounced the more you look into the subject. The amount of time and energy needed to become fully informed towards technology is mind crippling.

However, the use of nanochips in the human body, from how I understand it, is ultimately not a diagnostic tool, it is one that connects data with end readers and can enable this data to be merged. The tracking possibilities are immense, as is the misuse of data. RFID is already being used on a large scale by both the government and the private sector. Processes might be slowed down through activist groups who use influence on politics but I doubt they will stop them.

I would say that I am a sceptic and since I am, I am oftentimes astounded by peoples quick attachment to either glorify or condemn progressiveness when confronted.
Even rather reasonable people have tendencies to celebrate possible methods of "fighting old age" or other forms of augmentation. Oh well... I am tired talking of it.