I often find it is not worth to argue with atheists as they are living in some sort of fantasy land and deny reality.

That's a problem since many people seem to be atheists these days. At least, in my own circle of people that seems to be the case. ... But then, one cannot know for sure, since the art of debating must be learned and that is the biggest hurdle in communication. We jump too soon and we ask not enough questions towards each other. I sometimes take on the effort to argue with atheists. It's tedious, that's true. But if I can spare the time and have the nerv, I try to support them with sources.
It's so much easier to argue with people who own a dogma or principles, in comparison.

to create something from nothing,

That is a really strong argument, I find, and that's also why I think the text is worth spreading.

All air systems must have a barrier and therefore, once you reach one barrier, then there must be another world or system on the other side ad Infinitum. Ironically, the law of thermodynamics and the equalisation effect is the main reason that "Space" as it is presented to us does not and cannot exist. Our atmosphere would equalise with the air pressure in space.

Thank you, that is a very interesting aspect. So, did you find any explanations for the fact that our Earth has an atmosphere despite that it shouldn't? LOL I am hearing that for the first time.

What Mr. Musk does, I do not follow actively, I find that his celebrity status (for one a savior, for others the opposite) gets onto my nerves.

This doesnt just happen "by accident" lol

I very much see it the same. I know you are right but if you ask me, I have a hard time to say why. So I trust it.