Thank you for your effort in explaining what you have said. Unfortunately, I must confess that it is still not clear to me and I have not understood how what you say about DNA is relevant to your space-travelling human. I heard somewhere that the cradle of humanity was in Africa, but that didn't spark any further interest in me either, so I can't share the fascination that this changes the theory of how exactly and by means of which genes humans have spread across the globe. Are you aiming at the fact that whoever takes off in a spaceship as a single person or a group of four and finds a planet will artificially create humans there because he has DNA samples with him that will prevent him from inbreeding or that he will be able to reproduce them?

I don't need technical details when I'm rather sceptical about what reason a human being should have for setting off into space and what he thinks, how he can take what makes him an earthling with him to be able to wait in a completely alien environment, where there is nothing familiar, to be able to terraform a planet, how he can stay sane in the meantime?
But it is more likely that I reject the thought and your visions of the future, and therefore do not wish to travel mentally in that direction.
Unimaginable wealth is not something that attracts me, perhaps because I once tried to imagine what I would do if I had unlimited means and resources at my disposal and as soon as I moved from that theoretical notion to the practical detail, I encountered all sorts of hurdles that require more than one person and cannot be solved in mental space.
Nowadays people answer this by "Use artificial intelligence".

But oftentimes I came to the conclusion that things are insoluble and only the too strong effort to want to solve them creates problems. Whereas turning away from it at some point leads to solving a problem by not focusing on it like a burning glass but rather in a random and artful way. Does that make sense to you?