If it is as you say it is (the Universe is a galactic Internet and communication happens everywhere, all the time, in an instant), then why do you say that,

We will have to learn to develop an earth like field around us before we can leave.

?

According to this statement, if communication is happening anyway, we don't have to leave the earth, so why learn to develop a field?

If science has to start from scratch to learn what aether is, then I assume, as you do, that it will take a very long time.

If you have such knowledge as you say, it would be logical that you contact the current scientists or scientific works regarding their theories or have your own research to show. If this is not possible for you, if you cannot get a foot in the door of the scientific institutions or circles or if there are other obstacles, I would think it is futile to quarrel with the situation.

For the assertion of the complete falsity of theories you need your own written work, which you can give to those who might be interested. Otherwise your statements are built on sand and no one hears them who wants to understand anything about them professionally.

For me, as the recipient of your statements, they are not verifiable. You can tell me anything and I would have no way of checking whether your theories are better than those you named as false (gravity and what we believe of it).

I have no problem at all with the speed of light not being the constant as I had taken it to be, because, as I said, I know too little about it.

I remain sceptical when I hear statements that it is supposed to be a specific factor that influences complex systems, i.e. the statement that it is an "electric force" that makes the planets orbit the sun. It sounds that you give me a mono-cause. Embed it, so that I can follow. If you don't have the time or joy for this, it's idle to talk to me.